News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on First English dictionary of ancient Greek since Victorian era spares no blushes. Parent comment

Re:First English dictionary of ancient Greek since Victorian... by SideburnsOfDoom on Friday May 28, 2021 @02:58AM (#27312491)
In which context? In the context in which the dictionary entry was written for English academics in 1889, "gay" most certainly did mean "happy" and not homosexual. "Gay" did not come to commonly mean "homosexual" until decades later.

Grandparent post has the wrong end of the stick: no prudery is being inserted, outdated _English_ that would be misinterpreted by modern readers has been changed. Ancient Greek is a dead language. English is living.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:First English dictionary of ancient Greek since Victorian... by chmod775 on Friday May 28, 2021 @05:20AM (#27313279)
Note that, as others have also pointed out elsewhere, "gay woman" used to mean prostitute.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:First English dictionary of ancient Greek since Victorian... by SideburnsOfDoom on Friday May 28, 2021 @05:27AM (#27313309)
Right. I have doubts about the academic writer in 1889 using that meaning of "gay", as a phrase it was ambiguous then, and is _differently_ confusing now. Removing it seems like clarity not prudery. Indeed the opposite of prudery, it removes (literally) Victorian assumptions about the wearer of fancy clothes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:First English dictionary of ancient Greek since Victorian... by JoeyBananas on Friday May 28, 2021 @10:13AM (#27315549)
The original definition mentions that the sandals were worn by "fops," but the new definition doesn't say anything about an association with effeminate men. So, they're being prudish about bringing up something that can be interpreted as homophobic.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:First English dictionary of ancient Greek since Victorian... by klyrs on Friday May 28, 2021 @02:47PM (#27319077)
The irony for me is that historians have been purging records of homosexuality and gender nonconformity since time immemorial. To me, this looks like a potential historical record of of queer culture, replete with "queer coding" that we use to identify ourselves to others in the know. Might as well erase it, on the chance it might offend...
[ Parent | on HN ]