Re:The media's lab leak fiasco
by shaicoleman on Friday May 28, 2021 @05:40AM
(#27313371)
There was a disinformation campaign against Hydroxychloroquine as well. In the failed JAMA study, they administered a nearly toxic dose at late stage patients (when there's no viral replication). This is now being investigated [1].
The largest peer-reviewed study on HCQ (29K patients) showed 70% reduction in death with early treatment. [2]
1. https://www.moneytimes.com.br/heinze-pede-a-pf-que-investigu... (In Portuguese)
It's fine to point at the journals as the definers of what smart people should believe, but can't we say that the Lancet sucks for starting the anti-vax movement by publishing a shit paper by Wakefield, and damaged the integrity of science in general during an epidemic by publishing the hydroxychloroquine trash? Can we point out that they started some of our scariest antiscience trends?