World Now Likely to Hit Watershed 1.5 °C Rise in Next 5 Years

Re:World Now Likely to Hit Watershed 1.5 °C Rise in Next 5 Y... by willmadden on Thursday May 27, 2021 @06:42PM (#27309502)

You didn't read the article. You cherrypicked the parts of it that you could use to justify disregarding it. That's intellectually dishonest, lazy, and frankly typical for climate change cultists.

The bulk of the article discusses hydrology and how the sheer volume of water on the earth is more significant than C02 in terms of greenhouse effects. There's also a section about far higher historical C02 levels being present when temperatures were lower than today.

Respond to that part of the paper, not the tangent on the term "climate change" (which is also accurate, but not the meat of the argument).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:World Now Likely to Hit Watershed 1.5 °C Rise in Next 5 Y... by gspr on Friday May 28, 2021 @04:33AM (#27313026)

> how the sheer volume of water on the earth is more significant than C02 in terms of greenhouse effects

Where do you see this? I see a long rant about the definition of climate, sprinkled in with some cultural reference and some meaningless discussions about continuous vs discrete sampling (meaningless beyond any first year university course on any scientific topic).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:World Now Likely to Hit Watershed 1.5 °C Rise in Next 5 Y... by willmadden on Friday May 28, 2021 @10:11PM (#27322536)

Section 5. You have to actually read the article.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:World Now Likely to Hit Watershed 1.5 °C Rise in Next 5 Y... by gspr on Saturday May 29, 2021 @05:20PM (#27328294)

I've read it. There's no modelling or anything beyond speculation in secton 5.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:World Now Likely to Hit Watershed 1.5 °C Rise in Next 5 Y... by esarbe on Monday May 31, 2021 @01:39PM (#27346437)

You're a better, more patient human than I.

[ Parent | on HN ]