The only difference is that they didn't wait for 10-20-30 years to admit they were wrong; but even that admitting is half-assed and insincere. Yeah, Leenode, you're effed.
Namely, a link to a HN post about a single commit to a single project does nothing to provide specifics underlying the below claim:
> "While group contacts from the channels did not contact freenode staff directly, we were rather surprised when we received reports of unpleasant elements operating in the background and influencing these projects, namespaces and channels with false information in order to harm freenode’s administration and staff members’ images and paint a false narrative altogether."
It's also missing an accounting of the actual decision made to takeover the communication channels of open source communities without their consent.
It's generally never a good sign when your post-mortem starts off by casting blame towards a claimed conspiracy of anonymous foes seeking to harm you based on evidence that you refuse to reveal.
It's also missing an accounting of the actual decision made to takeover the communication channels of open source communities without their consent.