> Let the market decide.
I just want to spell out that these are political stances, and not universal truths.
An alternative political stance is that multiple factors conspire such that "get a different job" is for many people not a viable strategy. The situation under which a worker feels that their only viable strategy is working for Uber is beneficial to Uber.
Is it Uber's responsibility to ensure that there are multiple viable job strategies for people? No, not exactly. That's the responsibility of the government. We can't expect an entity to act against its own interests.
It is a legal truth. Uber is not legally responsible for providing FT or benefits period. You can argue they should be but as you pointed out, regulation is the responsibility of the government, not Uber.
Okay, well then how about we look at-...
>There is no way I’ll believe most drivers want to be employees.
... oh.
Where is the evidence? Interviewing a few drivers is not evidence.
That sounds like you would refuse to believe any other data, always and forever, if it contradicted your personal belief. Before anyone else might be able to chime in with other sources that may be more concrete, you have shut that down entirely. Your mind's made up, and that is that.
If a survey comes out that contradicts that, I'd have to review my stance, but for now, I'm skeptical.
Right on. That's all I was getting at. :)
So yea not Chicago.
Out of curiosity, how much do you spend on gas per hour? What are the other big expenses to cover? I'm thinking wear/tear, additional insurance, additional car washes, but having never driven I don't know.
Wear and tear on my car is hard to quantify, but one caveat is that I work from home for my regular IT job, so I no longer have commuting expenses. It's close to a wash in wear and tear because I only drive Uber on weekends.
Taxes are taxes. Gotta pay them no matter what.
I’d prefer an article that showed systemic driver responses. Not anecdotal interviews. There is no way I’ll believe most drivers want to be employees.
Again. If you don’t like driving rideshare, then get a different job. It’s not Uber’s responsibility to provide FT or benefits.
These complaints suggest they’re pro labor, but Uber is not a traditional employer. There is no law that says every business has to provide an employer/employee relationship.
If drivers don’t return to Uber, that will be the free market reset that forces Uber to adapt. If drivers take the sign up bonus and stop driving, Uber will have to adapt to that as well.
Let the market decide.