News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @01:47AM (#27273155)
Devil’s advocate: a lot of crime in San Francisco isn’t reported. For example, the case mentioned in the article.
Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by quanticle on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @01:54AM (#27273213)
The crime in the article was reported. From the article:

The police officer said he was glad to have the license plate number but that robbery is so low-profile in the courts right now that even if they did catch him, without video proof, the thieves would be let go within a day or so.

No, the officer didn't take action based upon what they saw, but it's reasonable to conclude that a police report was filled out for this incident.

Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by aranchelk on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @02:46AM (#27273628)
It would be entirely reasonable for the cops to file a report, but I would not make the assumption that they did.

Reasons cops file reports include:

An intention to investigate the crime

The victim requests a report for an insurance claim

In this case they know it’s a hard crime to investigate. Based on the articles I’ve read, it seems thieves in SF often use stolen cars, so even the plates may not be that helpful. Moreover we have serious crimes like attempted murder and illegal gun possession in SF going un-prosecuted, so the cops cannot assume an arrest could lead to anything at all.

Additionally filing a report with little hope for an arrest makes the precincts numbers look bad. Those numbers will get reported in neighborhood association meetings, and those association people (I’m one of them) can be a real pain in the ass to the politicians (i.e. the boss’s boss’s boss).

It’s just not a good incentive structure and if we were going to do a clean redesign IMO the politicians and cops should have as little control over the official statistics as possible.

Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by quanticle on Wednesday May 26, 2021 @03:43AM (#27287573)
Those are all fair points. I was thinking that the photographer would have asked for a report for insurance purposes, but maybe that isn't a great assumption.
Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by pvg on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @05:11AM (#27274621)
Sure, the data might be bad. That's a sensible objection - I think the question it raises is 'what's your data'. Like, what are you devil's advocating, on what basis. The 'quality of data' question applies universally.
Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by DeRock on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @01:59AM (#27273253)
The article mentions his conversation with the police, so assume it was reported.
Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by dannyw on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @02:02AM (#27273274)
Not necessarily. At least here, when a police officer tells me they don't have the resources to go after something, they don't even ask for any of my details (nor seem to care) so it's hard to imagine they're recorded.
Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by RobertoG on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @02:23AM (#27273429)
Is crime in San Francisco reported in a lower percentage than in other places? That sounds weird, why should?
Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by paxys on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @03:49AM (#27274061)
When the data supports your views – "here, look at this".

When the data doesn't support your views – "it isn't reported correctly anyways".

This is standard online discourse.

Re:I Was Robbed in San Francisco While the Cameras Rolled by paxys on Tuesday May 25, 2021 @01:54AM (#27273206)
The case mentioned in the article was reported. Reported != solved. If you called the police and they wrote it down, that's really all it takes to get counted.