News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A no-beef diet is great – but only if you don’t replace i... by xupybd on Sunday May 23, 2021 @05:34AM (#27253653)
What about local grass fed beef. I'm pretty sure it's the farming methods that are the problem not the animal you eat. I currently have 150kg of beef hanging. It grew up 10 minutes from my house, ate grass,and will feed us for six months.
Re:A no-beef diet is great – but only if you don’t replace i... by Cryptoclysm on Sunday May 23, 2021 @09:58AM (#27255043)
Grass-fed cows gain weight more slowly, so they produce more methane per unit of meat produced. However, it can be argued that grass fed cattle farming is a net positive for Greenhouse emissions, since the carbon captured by the larger pastures can offset the effect of the methane emissions from the cattle. In some cases the entire farm's operational emmisions could be offset. Note that this is climate dependent. [1]

It is important also to note that if the land were instead used for growing crop for human consumption, then the carbon capture effect would be far higher, and that generally grass fed beef in the US are fed grain in the final months before slaughter. Other factors like water usage of cattle farming per calorie produced compared to human consumed crop can put even grass fed cattle farming in a bad light.

[1]: https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/08/13/746576239/is...

Re:A no-beef diet is great – but only if you don’t replace i... by aww_dang on Sunday May 23, 2021 @10:33AM (#27255250)
There's a large amount of range land which is impractical for farming. However, it is suited for grazing. It was used for bison before domestic cattle.

If we conclude that bovine grazing is harmful, should we conclude that exterminating the American bison was green?

Re:A no-beef diet is great – but only if you don’t replace i... by pkphilip on Sunday May 23, 2021 @10:23AM (#27255189)
Cattle/livestock is also used for improving the quality/fertility of the soil for growing crops. It drastically reduces the need for harmful fertlizers, the need to till the land as much (reducing diesel usage) etc.. Also, the milk and meat is a nice bonus.
Re:A no-beef diet is great – but only if you don’t replace i... by loceng on Sunday May 23, 2021 @11:02AM (#27255440)
The Sacred Cow documentary is worth watching which goes into detail of this cycle - including that a lot (most?) crops use animal manure for fertilizing, so you still need the animals.
Re:A no-beef diet is great – but only if you don’t replace i... by pkphilip on Monday May 24, 2021 @10:02AM (#27264462)
Apart from that, livestock grazing has been used effectively to fight desertification by Allan Savory and others.

https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/reversing-desertification-with-l...

Re:A no-beef diet is great – but only if you don’t replace i... by underwater on Sunday May 23, 2021 @07:56AM (#27254384)
The article's point was that cows are a major source of greenhouse gases. Eating grass fed beef doesn't change that.
Re:A no-beef diet is great – but only if you don’t replace i... by loceng on Sunday May 23, 2021 @11:04AM (#27255453)
There's an effort to start to mass produce a type of algae that by adding a small % of it to their diet reduces methane by 80%+ from what I remember.