Wayland: “Move fast and break things” as a moral imperative

Re:Wayland: “Move fast and break things” as a moral imperative by kzrdude on Sunday May 23, 2021 @05:27AM (#27253603)

If all of GNOME/KDE/wlroots work under wayland, isn't that pretty good? Three implementations might be good enough to ensure the wayland protocol is sufficiently independent of the implementations?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wayland: “Move fast and break things” as a moral imperative by robert_foss on Sunday May 23, 2021 @05:29AM (#27253618)

QT (without KDE) also supports Wayland.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wayland: “Move fast and break things” as a moral imperative by j16sdiz on Sunday May 23, 2021 @05:42AM (#27253693)

QT is the toolkit. This post is about the composer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wayland: “Move fast and break things” as a moral imperative by bluGill on Sunday May 23, 2021 @05:39AM (#27253683)

Right, the toolkit is what counts. QT, GTK, and what else? I know there are others, but those are the big two most programs use.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Wayland: “Move fast and break things” as a moral imperative by pkos98 on Sunday May 23, 2021 @06:16AM (#27253869)

there are many electron-based applications (like VsCode) as well as wt least one important Java Swing application: IntelliJ. Both kind of applications, electron and Java Swing, were facing severe issues on wayland when I tried it a year ago on sway.

[ Parent | on HN ]