The policy page you listed said no spamming. Your blog complaint says you spammed.

I really don't think that's going to fly.

People are concerned that you don't have the community's best interests at heart. Your actions say you don't have the community's best interests at heart.

All this lawyering corpspeak means nothing when your actions don't back it up.

If you want to prove us wrong, walk the walk.

edit:

Looking at the list of top10 channels[0], several of them have such notices in their topics. If this takeover was policy, can we assume you'll do the same to ##linux? Or is it a very selective policy only to be enforced when you have a personal interest or believe you can get away with it?

[0] https://netsplit.de/channels/?net=Freenode

"This channel has moved to Liberachat, effective immediately: irc.libera.chat ##hntop"

You and I have very, very different definitions of spam. I see a guidepost giving me direction.

Are you implying that you are going to deny every community that envisages to leave your network to advertise to their users that they moved ?

If ##hntop was truly involved in spam, you would shut it down, not take it over.

You are losing trust with every word.

Where does it say that?