News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A new replication crisis: Research that is less likely to... by dagw on Saturday May 22, 2021 @09:05AM (#27246121)
The problem isn't just the scientists, it goes all the way up. Let's say we implement your system. Who decides how many 'smart professors' the Type Theory group gets to hire? What if the Type Theory and Machine Learning departments both want to hire a new 'smart professor' but the Computer Science department only has money to hire one more person?

One reasonable approach might be to look at which group has produced the 'best' research over the past few years. But how do you judge that in a way that seems fair? Once you have a criteria to judge that, then people will start to game that criteria.

Or taking a step up, The university needs to save money. How do you judge if the Chemistry department or the Computer Science department should have its funding cut.

No matter how you slice it at some point you're going to need a way for someone to judge which of two departments is producing the 'best' research and thus deserves more money, and that will incentivize people to game that metric.

Re:A new replication crisis: Research that is less likely to... by alexashka on Monday May 24, 2021 @02:51AM (#27261663)
There is no shortage of resources to provide for every person who wants to devote their life to discovering something valuable for all of humankind.

We aren't short on food, shelter, clothes, tech, etc - those are all solved problems.

The problem that isn't solved is stupid people sitting in charge of decisions they don't have the brain make-up to comprehend or manage, making pretend they know what they're doing, holding people far superior to them hostage.