Re:A new replication crisis: Research that is less likely to...
by nebulous1 on Saturday May 22, 2021 @09:30AM
(#27246337)
I think you might be mistaken. The study of Nature/Science papers was "Evaluating replicability of social science experiments published in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015"
No, it isn't. It looked at a few different fields, and found that the problem was actually worse for general science papers published in Nature/Science, where non-reproducible papers were cited 300 times more often as reproducible ones.