Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire
by fxtentacle on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:02PM
(#27239936)
All the services that I rely upon on my Android phone are free 3rd party apps. Firefox, Banking, Authentication, Calendar
So if the "Epic Phone" had the ability to install and run APKs, that'd be good enough.
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire
by nradov on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:34PM
(#27240246)
Those APKs will only work on devices with licensed Google Play services. And that platform changes so rapidly that it's effectively impossible for a competitor to build compatible APIs without infringing on Google's IP.
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire
by JackGreyhat on Friday May 21, 2021 @06:00PM
(#27240509)
I have an android phone without google play enabled or installed. Not even a replacement framework such as MicroG or whatever. Works fine. Check how f-doid apps are running, or what it requires. No google license, api, nothing.
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire
by xixo on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:08PM
(#27239993)
Many people recycle phones every couple of years. If the phone functions as a typical smartphone with a gaming bent, it could replace traditional smartphones for folks who want to game. Gamers also carry secondary hand-held devices (like the Nintendo Switch) for dedicated gameplay.
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire
by slver on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:09PM
(#27240005)
Do you realize how many failed devices fit that category. Those who don't know their history...
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire
by xixo on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:20PM
(#27240102)
I only said it could work, not that it will. I am aware of the many failures in this category. I also wanted to point out that the original premise (nobody would buy an Epic phone because it must be their second phone) is flawed. Not only could it replace their primary phone, but gamers do indeed buy, charge, and carry secondary hand-held devices if the device suits their needs.
Re:Judge in Fortnite case holds Tim Cook's feet to the fire
by slver on Friday May 21, 2021 @05:26PM
(#27240167)
"Gamers" represent a tiny percent of the game-playing public. If Epic needs to rely on "gamers" they'd go bankrupt.
Also I like how all of those theories just sit in vacuum, as if we're not going through a major economic contraction due to a two year global pandemic, but sure, everyone has the money to get themselves a second phone, because they decided not to eat anymore.
Maybe think through what you're proposing. Do you believe most of Epic's customers will buy two phones, charge two phones and carry two phones just so they can play their games, while also having access to first-class OS services like Google and Apple offer?
No.