Re:Citizen CEO offered to personally fund LA arson manhunt f...
by MaxBarraclough on Friday May 21, 2021 @02:59PM
(#27238409)
How are they not guilty of impersonating the police?
Re:Citizen CEO offered to personally fund LA arson manhunt f...
by tgsovlerkhgsel on Friday May 21, 2021 @03:33PM
(#27238844)
By never claiming they are police.
If their vest said police or had a police badge, or if they claimed to be police, they'd be guilty of impersonating police.
Dressing up in a generic tacticool uniform isn't impersonating police.
Re:Citizen CEO offered to personally fund LA arson manhunt f...
by sebmellen on Friday May 21, 2021 @04:15PM
(#27239325)
They have pictures which clearly show them detaining someone (at least for the camera). I think at some point this crosses a boundary, or at the very least it should https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5e55ad75dc2699....
Re:Citizen CEO offered to personally fund LA arson manhunt f...
by colejohnson66 on Friday May 21, 2021 @04:25PM
(#27239475)
Citizen’s (heh) arrests are legal (in some jurisdictions and with some restrictions). I’d assume that’s what’s happening in that photo.
Re:Citizen CEO offered to personally fund LA arson manhunt f...
by sebmellen on Friday May 21, 2021 @04:35PM
(#27239619)
I would hope to god one could make the legal argument that one only submitted to the arrest being under the impression they were police officers, and that they were thus impersonating police. Then sue them to hell and destroy the company.
I don’t see how people can build companies like this or work such jobs. It really stretches the limits of human decency.
> “Subscription law enforcement service” [0]
[0]: https://losangelesprofessionalsecurity.com/