News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Welcome to Libera Chat by hunter2_ on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @02:13PM (#27212301)
A name for the male segment of this class of words is "bronoun," which includes things like bro, man, guy, etc.

Basically anything you can use in place of a name, so long as the grammatical usage is namelike.

"That guy doesn't have a clue." -- guy is a noun

"Guy doesn't have a clue." -- guy is a pronoun (you can tell because "he" also works grammatically)

However, I think these would need to be in the initial position(s) when slash-delimiting one's pronouns, because the final position is for a possessive form. That is, they're analogous to "he" but not analogous to "his" (and using them like "him" would be a stretch, as far as I can figure...), which might be what got GP in hot water.

Re:Welcome to Libera Chat by wearywanderer on Wednesday May 19, 2021 @02:34PM (#27212566)
> "Guy doesn't have a clue." -- guy is a pronoun (you can tell because "he" also works grammatically)

You don't think that's merely people being lazy and leaving off a word that can be inferred ('That')? This is something I often do in casual conversation, particularly vocal conversations:

"I am wondering what you mean" - 'I' is a pronoun

"Wondering what you mean" - 'Wondering' is now the pronoun??? Clearly not. It's just a way that people are lazy and sloppy with grammar when correct grammar isn't important.

Re:Welcome to Libera Chat by hunter2_ on Thursday May 20, 2021 @12:45AM (#27217465)
This is convincing.

But to answer your "wondering" question: nope, because "he/him/his," nor their analogues (person, number, gender, etc.), don't work there.