Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by vbuterin on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @03:44PM
(#27200017)
That was about users' nodes being able to validate blocks; that's an orthogonal issue from PoW vs PoS.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by jude- on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @04:31PM
(#27200637)
Coins that no ones' nodes validate are worthless, aren't they?
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by ekerstein on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @03:10PM
(#27199530)
This is only relevant if people aren’t holding their coins on exchanges. Most users are and that concentration will increase as transaction fees are designed to do over the next decade.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by fredfoobar on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @03:13PM
(#27199585)
I'm here to help that transition, It's already happening, many folks I know are transitioning to a hardware wallet. I've personally helped people onboard on to lightning and running their own node.
The whole process of running your own node has improved so much nowadays: getumbrel.com comes to mind.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by dahfizz on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @02:47PM
(#27199237)
Why wouldn't a similar "takeover" be possible in a PoS system? You really haven't addressed the parent's point.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by grubles on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @04:40PM
(#27200759)
You can do much worse things in a PoS system since power in the system is tied to the asset (ETH). Ethereum DeFi toys are hacked on a daily basis and millions upon millions of dollars worth of ETH is stolen.
It's exactly why the DAO hacker was censored -- they controlled more ETH than any single account in the system.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by fredfoobar on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @02:51PM
(#27199288)
[responding to the pre-edit question about PoW] I just did, you don't need any capital to run a node. The book documents an incident where there was majority hash-rate (miners) wanting to change the rules against the wishes of the users.
more info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IT4s-6T__k
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by crispyporkbites on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @03:26PM
(#27199768)
But at scale you need lots of nodes/computational power and therefore lots of money. It doesn’t really make a difference whether you buy graphics cards in a pow world or ethereum in a pos world, you need lots of capital to be influential.
Now if we could make it Proof of Human, one vote, one person, non-transferable, that would be true distributed consensus. Even then you would get people buying votes with advertising as we see today in “normal” elections.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by fredfoobar on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @07:20PM
(#27202581)
> But at scale you need lots of nodes/computational power and therefore lots of money. It doesn’t really make a difference whether you buy graphics cards in a pow world or ethereum in a pos world, you need lots of capital to be influential.
You're missing the energy part of the equation (opex), that is continuously required.
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by hanniabu on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @04:56PM
(#27200970)
> you don't need any capital to run a node
Please point me in the direction where I can find some of these free ASIC miners.....
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by fredfoobar on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @05:30PM
(#27201461)
full node != miner
Run your own full node,
easiest option: getumbrel.com
Re:Ethereum will use around 99.95% less energy post merge
by SilasX on Tuesday May 18, 2021 @02:53PM
(#27199326)
Did you mean PoS? Parent was talking about a PoW system.
"Roughly 90% of the hash power once threatened to change the rules of #Bitcoin believing the users didn’t matter in the decision. The users spun up 10s of thousands of full nodes & told them to go f*ck themselves." [1]
[1] https://twitter.com/TheCryptoconomy/status/13940065488763084...