Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by nkrisc on Monday May 17, 2021 @08:07AM
(#27182529)
Why have smart contracts indeed, if executing the code in the contract is called a "hack." Perhaps in the case in the article a trusted third party would have been superior and there wouldn't be $10M missing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.