News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack. Parent comment

Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack by NateEag on Sunday May 16, 2021 @10:00PM (#27179334)
100% code coverage isn't even close to a guarantee of correctness.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack by o-__-o on Sunday May 16, 2021 @11:03PM (#27179684)
But is the easiest metric to guage test quality. What I’m saying is this code is probably not well tested
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack by dr_zoidberg on Monday May 17, 2021 @06:29AM (#27181956)
This code isn't tested at all. They messed up copying code from a previous implementation, that's how bad this is. If they had had a few basic tests in place they would've spotted this before it even had a chance to be a problem.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack by o-__-o on Thursday May 20, 2021 @04:15AM (#27218690)
Then the problem has zero to do with the type of testing, now does it :)
[ Parent | on HN ]