Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by alextheparrot on Sunday May 16, 2021 @04:46PM
(#27176881)
This is actually a bit amusing, because one of my favorite reading features on iPad is being able to click and hold on an arbitrary word to look it up.
Sure, the UI/UX of a traditional link isn't desirable, but I do want every word to be linkable to the dictionary.
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by Arnavion on Sunday May 16, 2021 @04:49PM
(#27176901)
You can copy-paste a word from the website into your search engine too. The website doesn't have to do anything. Just like the program you used on your iPad didn't do anything, it was the iPad providing the select-and-dictionary feature.
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by saurik on Sunday May 16, 2021 @04:53PM
(#27176930)
Sounds great as a feature of your client, not of every single site.
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by anyfoo on Sunday May 16, 2021 @04:52PM
(#27176922)
On the Mac too, you can just "force press" the touchpad on any word and a definition comes up. As a non-native English speaker, I use it quite a lot.
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by mwlp on Sunday May 16, 2021 @05:21PM
(#27177106)
or highlight and ctrl+cmd+d :)
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by nemetroid on Sunday May 16, 2021 @06:00PM
(#27177411)
Firefox has an option for this in the right-click menu after selecting text (e.g. by double-clicking).
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by dylan604 on Sunday May 16, 2021 @04:52PM
(#27176921)
I'm pretty sure I've seen some of those ad afiliate javascript libraries that add links to words in a paragraphs back to some random website that used a matching keyword that looked very close to your example.
At least, way back before I started using blockers.
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by charonn0 on Sunday May 16, 2021 @05:23PM
(#27177128)
It's a poor speaker who blames the audience for not understanding.
Re:Missing line in a smart contract leads to $10M hack
by tylersmith on Sunday May 16, 2021 @05:57PM
(#27177389)
Not every random reader of an article is in its intended audience. The audience the speaker is writing for understands the article fine.
This is a fine sentiment, but [you] [don't] [link] [every] [word] [in] [your] [sentence] to a dictionary website either, because you expect the reader to know English. In the same way it's perfectly fine to write an article with a target audience that understands the concepts being discussed. Not everything needs to be written for a general audience; this website is exclusively about cryptocurrency, and particularly dense with jargon and slang at that.