Re:Was cancer less likely in a pre-industrial world?
by sokoloff on Saturday May 15, 2021 @10:01AM
(#27165320)
Is tobacco use higher today vs pre-industrial eras? I don’t think of it as a particularly modern introduction to humanity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Was cancer less likely in a pre-industrial world?
by magneticnorth on Saturday May 15, 2021 @10:07AM
(#27165365)
Tobacco was unknown in Europe until Europeans were introduced to it by native Americans.
Re:Was cancer less likely in a pre-industrial world?
by sokoloff on Saturday May 15, 2021 @10:09AM
(#27165379)
Wow. That’s mind-blowing. I knew it was a huge economic driver in the early American colonies, but I always imagined it pre-dated [in Europe] the colonization.
Thank you for my TIL!
Re:Was cancer less likely in a pre-industrial world?
by throw0101a on Saturday May 15, 2021 @10:34AM
(#27165574)
Other things that changed post-1492: potatoes, maize (corn), tomatoes, cocoa (chocolate), vanilla are probably most predominant across the Atlantic.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbian_exchange
Bunch of stuff happening in the Pacific as well, e.g., chilli peppers (capsicum):
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chili_pepper#Distribution_to_A...
Good book:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1493:_Uncovering_the_New_World...
Re:Was cancer less likely in a pre-industrial world?
by triceratops on Saturday May 15, 2021 @02:33PM
(#27167699)
The entire Colombian Exchange is eye-opening. Try to imagine Italian food without tomatoes, Indian food without chili peppers, or a Britain with no chips to accompany their fried fish.