Java JDK 1.0 (1996)

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by zozbot234 on Saturday May 15, 2021 @06:51AM (#27164108)

Note that this is under a proprietary license (see toplevel COPYRIGHT code). Given the rather messy history around the Java API, it might be legally problematic to look at this code.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by akie on Saturday May 15, 2021 @07:57AM (#27164426)

I just did a legally problematic thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by johnwheeler on Saturday May 15, 2021 @08:22AM (#27164546)

I doubt Oracle is going to sue

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by hota_mazi on Saturday May 15, 2021 @12:17PM (#27166504)

Yeah, they're not the kind of company that sues.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by anoncake on Saturday May 15, 2021 @04:38PM (#27168785)

One Reasonable Adult Called Larry Elison

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by johnwheeler on Sunday May 16, 2021 @11:02PM (#27179681)

Just let me know when they sue.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by andrewshadura on Saturday May 15, 2021 @09:26AM (#27164998)

I wouldn't at all be surprised if they did.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by dvfjsdhgfv on Saturday May 15, 2021 @02:26PM (#27167628)

A nice C&D will suffice.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Java JDK 1.0 (1996) by emma-w on Saturday May 15, 2021 @01:13PM (#27166999)

That was my risky click for the day!

[ Parent | on HN ]