News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DarkSide ransomware gang quits after servers, Bitcoin sta... by lancemurdock on Friday May 14, 2021 @03:34PM (#27158785)
so which is it then?

"BTC is bad cause it can be used by drug dealers to launder money"

"BTC is not even secure from government access"

Surely someone will point out both can be true but the point is the anti-btc folks seem to be talking out both sides of the mouth

Re:DarkSide ransomware gang quits after servers, Bitcoin sta... by simias on Friday May 14, 2021 @05:06PM (#27159694)
I think it's both: people who have something to hide for the government can make it pretty hard (but not impossible) for the authorities to track them down. On the other hand average people who don't have "anything to hide" have no reason to bother implementing these counter-measures, making it fairly easy to track their transactions on the public blockchain.

In this case even the pros messed it up, but this is a very high profile case with undoubtedly a massive amount of manpower thrown at it in various agencies. You don't mess with USA's oil.

And even then it's unclear if the money was actually confiscated.

Re:DarkSide ransomware gang quits after servers, Bitcoin sta... by zepto on Saturday May 15, 2021 @11:54AM (#27166313)
> Surely someone will point out both can be true but the point is the anti-btc folks seem to be talking out both sides of the mouth

Can you explain how you reach this conclusion? It doesn’t seem to follow.

Re:DarkSide ransomware gang quits after servers, Bitcoin sta... by lancemurdock on Saturday May 15, 2021 @12:11PM (#27166465)
A talking point to the dangers of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency is that it can be hard to trace bad actors using the network to launder money. The comment I replied too was stating "debunks another favourite talking point of the crypto people that it secures your money from government access."

Both of those seem pretty hard to be true at the same time

Re:DarkSide ransomware gang quits after servers, Bitcoin sta... by zepto on Saturday May 15, 2021 @12:26PM (#27166591)
> Both of those seem pretty hard to be true at the same time

That’s what doesn’t seem to follow.

Cash, for example is hard to trace if the serial numbers haven’t already been recorded, and good for money laundering, for example, but it doesn’t secure your money from government access if the government puts resources into it.

Re:DarkSide ransomware gang quits after servers, Bitcoin sta... by TacticalCoder on Friday May 14, 2021 @04:28PM (#27159331)
> Surely someone will point out both can be true but the point is the anti-btc folks seem to be talking out both sides of the mouth

The most beautiful being: "The cryptocurrencies scam should all stop but, please, let us collect all the due taxes on the gains you made".

From that standpoint which one is it: are they legal or illegal? Because it's funny that they both want it to be illegal, yet they want people to pay taxes on the gains they made.

Hypocrites.

Re:DarkSide ransomware gang quits after servers, Bitcoin sta... by simcup on Friday May 14, 2021 @06:31PM (#27160369)
Not hypocritic at all. From a legal perspective even illegal made money is money made and therefore subject of taxation. Tecnically you even have to describe the means by that you have come to it. Otherwise you are commiting tax evasion. For example if you sell 100k worth of access to documented child abuse, you have to pay taxes on those 100k. Thats why you have to launder money made from illegal activities