News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Avoid Git LFS if possible by acdha on Friday May 14, 2021 @12:28PM (#27156113)
Doesn't that also apply to, say, GitLab paying their team? The pricing for a highly-available service isn't as cheap as it could be but it doesn't seem terribly far off of S3's pricing.

I know that a small game studio must have a tight budget — and yours looks like a really interesting project (just subscribed) — but it seemed like an awfully strong objection to what I would have assumed would be a small fraction of your total expenses.

Re:Avoid Git LFS if possible by Dylan16807 on Friday May 14, 2021 @03:33PM (#27158770)
It's good for GitLab to pay their teams, but that stops being a justification to pay them more once the profit margin for a service gets high enough.

> it doesn't seem terribly far off of S3's pricing

GitHub's offering is close to S3 but only because AWS charges so much for bandwidth. The storage portion is less than a quarter of the equivalent bill.

And then GitLab is charging 5x as much as GitHub.