News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:So You Got a Google+ Invite... now what? by ary on Thursday June 30, 2011 @03:10PM (#2715339)
"Invite" is a verb, and "invitation" is a noun. Journalists should know better.
Re:So You Got a Google+ Invite... now what? by gte910h on Thursday June 30, 2011 @03:14PM (#2715356)
Invite is an also a noun meaning invitation. Invitation is the more formal version of the same concept.

You can say "I wish she was not so informal", but that's a perfectly reasonable use of the word.

Invite dates to 1649 and invitation dates to the 15th century. (m-w.com)

Re:So You Got a Google+ Invite... now what? by hugh3 on Thursday June 30, 2011 @04:03PM (#2715524)
You can say "I wish she was not so informal", but that's a perfectly reasonable use of the word

Surely it should be "I wish she were not so informal"?

Re:So You Got a Google+ Invite... now what? by gte910h on Thursday June 30, 2011 @05:05PM (#2715732)
No, "were" would only be used if you were supposing a condition different than reality. When used in the first person, it's the past subjunctive. So a valid sentence with "were" might be:

"If she were a man."

As the writer is in informal in the judgement of the commenter, the commenter therefore should use "was".

Re:So You Got a Google+ Invite... now what? by walterr on Thursday June 30, 2011 @07:52PM (#2716264)
But the wished-for condition is exactly that, or else it wouldn't have to be wished for. Yes, the writer is informal -- but the condition wished for is "not so informal".
Re:So You Got a Google+ Invite... now what? by gte910h on Thursday June 30, 2011 @08:02PM (#2716281)
Good point.
Re:So You Got a Google+ Invite... now what? by ary on Thursday June 30, 2011 @04:15PM (#2715569)
I stand corrected. The use of the word in this context feels colloquial though.