Re:Prioritise the Highest Order Bit
by greatgoat420 on Friday May 14, 2021 @09:49PM
(#27161552)
I have tried prioritizing the highest-order bit, but regrettably I never know the endian-ness of my bits. Maybe I am flipping a high order bit, maybe a low order bit.
Re:Prioritise the Highest Order Bit
by dwpdwpdwpdwpdwp on Friday May 14, 2021 @09:08PM
(#27161327)
This is gobbledygook.
The title, in a software sense, implies a binary/Byte interpretation of the word ‘bit’. I clicked through and there’s an accompanying picture of drill bits.
That’s illustrative of the overall level of coherence and clarity of argument this article provides.
Re:Prioritise the Highest Order Bit
by shoo on Friday May 14, 2021 @09:28PM
(#27161448)
i disagree, it isn't gobbledygook. it's not necessarily a great analogy but the underlying idea that the analogy is trying to help you remember and communicate is a reasonable and useful one:
> When evaluating past decisions or thinking about making new ones, a useful analogy to use is the flipping of the highest-order bit.
> aim to identify and flip the highest order bit because if you don't, you're not going to be able to make up for it by flipping everything else.
Other ways of trying to remember and communicate a similar idea could the "80 / 20 rule" -- e.g. small subset of effort/population/whatever often contributes disproportionately to some output.
Theory of Constraints / Eli Goldratt's book "The Goal" is another bunch of related concepts. Decide on what your big picture objective is, investigate and analyse the system to discover what the main bottleneck is. Focus on removing that bottleneck.
But I guess it doesn't sound as good to some people without an analogy. Meh.
The title, in a software sense, implies a binary/Byte interpretation of the word ‘bit’. I clicked through and there’s an accompanying picture of drill bits.
That’s illustrative of the overall level of coherence and clarity of argument this article provides.
I think the drill bits are just a humorous pic.
And I think the article makes sense. It discusses prioritizing coherently which often means de-prioritizing many important things.
> When evaluating past decisions or thinking about making new ones, a useful analogy to use is the flipping of the highest-order bit.
> aim to identify and flip the highest order bit because if you don't, you're not going to be able to make up for it by flipping everything else.
Other ways of trying to remember and communicate a similar idea could the "80 / 20 rule" -- e.g. small subset of effort/population/whatever often contributes disproportionately to some output.
Theory of Constraints / Eli Goldratt's book "The Goal" is another bunch of related concepts. Decide on what your big picture objective is, investigate and analyse the system to discover what the main bottleneck is. Focus on removing that bottleneck.
Thus the analogy is completely invalid. I couldn't read further.