There is no way to say that with certainty. SpaceX is far from the only rocket company and while yes, they have had great success, their success only makes it harder for other rocket companies to stand out and succeed. What if another company was just a a year or two behind SpaceX but got their funding shit on when SpaceX launched their rocket?

SpaceX is standing on the shoulders of giants, if SpaceX didn't exist, the science and people wouldn't just disappear.

I don't think anyone is saying that without SpaceX science and people wouldn't exist.

But, SpaceX and Tesla for sure accelerated the EVs market and reusable rockets. I don't think anyone could've created this level of buzz around their companies. Main thing being that most of the general public now knows about Tesla and SpaceX and the awareness around EVs and reusable rockets. Now, I'm not saying Musk is some godsend or something, but he definitely played big role in creating this buzz around space travel and EVs.

> their success only makes it harder for other rocket companies to stand out and succeed.

Of course it does. That's one of the main points of one's success and it is true for every single field in existence. By that logic, no one should succeed because that would make it difficult for others? I strongly disagree with that one.

I disagree. Competition is good.