Why Google+ Has Already Failed

Re:Why Google+ Has Already Failed by debaserab2 on Thursday June 30, 2011 @01:42PM (#2714987)

I feel (and I believe this to be the author's sentiment as well) that Google Plus does not innovate enough on any existing products to grant it significant relevance.

Google dominated because it did search much better than it's competitors and got people the search results they were looking for.

Google+ does nothing for me that I cannot get with Facebook.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Google+ Has Already Failed by j_r_ on Thursday June 30, 2011 @01:55PM (#2715046)

Well, it seems to me that the author makes some kind of moral argument out of the whole thing in a David vs. Goliath kind of way. Certainly both are (huge) corporations but I still trust Google more. They still seem to have a sane leadership which I'm not so sure about with Facebook. Maybe I just don't like Zuckerberg ... He just is not the kind of underdog that I would like to succeed. (Edit: Neither is Google, but the author makes it look like Facebook should be support in a way.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Google+ Has Already Failed by jase_coop on Thursday June 30, 2011 @02:25PM (#2715162)

I'm neither pro Google or Facebook.

I merely make a comparison between the early days, intentions and motives of both Google+ and Facebook, how they're different and why I think that difference is important.

[ Parent | on HN ]