Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by freshair on Thursday May 13, 2021 @06:13PM
(#27148153)
If the mugger isn't bluffing, then he'll get your money one way or the other. This makes it different from paying ransoms.
Furthermore, a corporation's bottom line is not truly comparable to a human life. However it is my understanding that paying ransoms to save human lives is technically illegal to. If paying a ransom to save your family member's life is illegal, then corporations paying ransoms to protect their finances should certainly be illegal.
Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by FDSGSG on Thursday May 13, 2021 @08:38PM
(#27149281)
>However it is my understanding that paying ransoms to save human lives is technically illegal to
You are wrong.
Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by freshair on Friday May 14, 2021 @10:39AM
(#27154793)
I did some more research and it seems I am substantially correct; paying a ransom to a terrorist organization is illegal.
Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by FDSGSG on Saturday May 15, 2021 @09:00AM
(#27164801)
Substantially correct? Paying ransoms is legal except for a very limited set of payment recipients.
Re:Colonial Pipeline Paid Hackers Nearly $5M in Ransom
by motbob on Thursday May 13, 2021 @06:24PM
(#27148264)
Not a good analogy, for two reasons. First, workers who don't have equity in a company don't really have a gun to their head even if the existence of the company is at risk. The real "gun to the head" is the threat of jail time. Second, it has historically been difficult to convince dozens of people to coordinate with each other and do something illegal for little to no personal gain.
All you are doing is incentivizing companies to not report these attacks.