Just restarted being serious, kind of, at photography with a D200, 18-140 Nikkor and a FX Tamron up to 300. And the pictures are nice! I guess cameras, especially sensors, got good enough around 2010 to not make that much of a difference anymore. Which leaves lenses, like always. And the difference between FX and DX. I don't think Nikon will go under so. There lenses are decent, as are the Z-series bodies. And then there are people like me, that won't switch to another brand. Of the big three so, I do see Nikon the weakest. Not because of their products, but because Sony and Canon have additional revenue streams to cameras. If Nikon goes under, that would be quite said so. And the time to gear up maybe faster on a Z mount system. One can dream of a Z7 and and Z6II, can't one?