News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Benchmarking division and libdivide on Apple M1 and Intel... by joenathanone on Thursday May 13, 2021 @12:48AM (#27138523)
> If you drop backwards compatibility, you can get a lot of headroom for better performance.

Microsoft tried that with the Surface X and failed

Re:Benchmarking division and libdivide on Apple M1 and Intel... by travisgriggs on Thursday May 13, 2021 @01:29AM (#27138742)
Did they really try though? The Surface RT always felt like a tentative "what do you think?" that got thrown under the bus pretty quick as soon as there was any whining.

When Apple rolls out a product, there's some transitional overlap, but you can see them getting ready to burn their viking ships in that period. Microsoft's efforts always have lacked that kind of commit factor. IMO.

Re:Benchmarking division and libdivide on Apple M1 and Intel... by rbanffy on Thursday May 13, 2021 @03:44AM (#27139455)
They halfheartedly tried that on Windows NT with MIPS, PPC, Alpha, and Itanium versions.

Lack of key software from Microsoft doomed them to a niche.

Re:Benchmarking division and libdivide on Apple M1 and Intel... by shaklee3 on Thursday May 13, 2021 @01:01AM (#27138585)
Not really. They never stopped x86 as the main product.