News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Flask 2.0 by 1f60c on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @03:02PM (#27133908)
3.5 has been EOL for 8 months now. (Source: https://endoflife.date/python)

I’m guessing they want to tell people it’s time to upgrade. And 3.6 brings a lot of niceties that they might want to use, like f-strings.

Re:Flask 2.0 by skvark on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @03:39PM (#27134299)
Many projects are dropping support for old Python versions very fast. It's not surprising given the history of the Python 2 -> 3 transition. No one wants to end up in that situation anymore. For example, NumPy has already dropped 3.6 support (3.6 will be EOL later this year).
Re:Flask 2.0 by remram on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @04:47PM (#27134974)
I don't know about "very fast", Python 3.6 was released in 2016 giving people plenty of time to update from 3.5. Those are backward-compatible too.

If you haven't updated in that time, you probably have a systemic problem which shouldn't be blamed on Python moving too fast (in fact I suspect those people don't keep up with bugfixes either, so nudging them to upgrade when they try to update flask/numpy is a good idea).

Re:Flask 2.0 by kstrauser on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @03:17PM (#27134083)
That’s what I’ve done on personal projects. The benefits of dropping support for the old version are large enough to outweigh the tiny drawbacks of not supporting it.