News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Germany bans Facebook from handling WhatsApp data over pr... by odiroot on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @05:45AM (#27128474)
> This probably won't fly in Germany as Germans are very privacy cautious.

After having lived in Germany for ~7 years this statement always makes me laugh.

Some examples:

* Names on doorbells (yes, visible from the street).

* People using "loyalty cards" left and right, letting the merchants track their behaviour even if they pay with cash.

* Giving a stack of papers (including ID copy, salary statements etc) to a real estate owner to apply for a rental.

Re:Germany bans Facebook from handling WhatsApp data over pr... by durnygbur on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @07:48AM (#27129187)
Truth is, once registered at an address in Germany one is fully transparent to and trackable by all domestic actors - public, malicious, predatory. Any privacy hysteria in Germany boils down to one of: "Americans will watch us" or "Slavs will steal our possesions". Then there is the cherry on the top "Slavs will use American system to steal our possesions".
Re:Germany bans Facebook from handling WhatsApp data over pr... by CRConrad on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @11:28AM (#27131439)
Well, the Little Father Of The Russians -- pretty much an Über-Slav, no? -- already used American and British systems to steal a British referendum and an American election, so the cherry-on-top Germans seem to be the ones who got it right.
Re:Germany bans Facebook from handling WhatsApp data over pr... by durnygbur on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @11:57AM (#27131803)
Not sure if serious or... heh.
Re:Germany bans Facebook from handling WhatsApp data over pr... by lxgr on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @07:41AM (#27129145)
> * Names on doorbells (yes, visible from the street).

You need these because somehow the concept of apartment numbers does not exist. As a result, mail and food delivery in large apartment buildings is interesting as well.

It seems pretty bizarre compared to all other countries I've ever sent mail to.

> * People using "loyalty cards" left and right, letting the merchants track their behaviour even if they pay with cash.

I'd argue that there is a pretty bimodal distribution of the population when it comes to privacy: Some people don't care at all and will use these cards, while others will fight every single bit of data stored about them tooth and nail.

> * Giving a stack of papers (including ID copy, salary statements etc) to a real estate owner to apply for a rental.

What's the problem here? Paper is inherently safe, unlike digital data. /s

Well, at least faxes have been officially declared equally safe (or unsafe) as email, which hopefully will finally kill them off as the communications technology of choice of the administration.