News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Sidewalk by devman0 on Tuesday May 11, 2021 @01:43PM (#27121085)
There is the rub, the smart features subsidize the price instead of adding to it as it becomes an expected revenue stream.

You can already get dumb TV, they are often used for signage or other commercial purposes, but they cost a lot more than consumer equipment.

Re:Amazon Sidewalk by nucleardog on Tuesday May 11, 2021 @02:52PM (#27121977)
They're not more expensive _just_ because of the lack of ads subsidization.

They also generally are just better built. The expected hours of operation and MTBF of the components is generally much higher than consumer displays. Many of the ones I dealt with had metal cases and stronger glass.

They're expected to stand up to much more abuse or often be installed in places where they're inconvenient to service.

If you wanted to build a non-smart panel with the expected lifespan of a typical consumer TV a significant portion of the current cost could likely be cut if it were done at scale.

Re:Amazon Sidewalk by justicezyx on Tuesday May 11, 2021 @02:27PM (#27121652)
I did not know that.

Is the "smart features" actually making money for the TV manufacturers?

A good question to think about. How can we, as consumers, incentivize the TV manufactures to focus on building good product that actually liked by users, and still making good money.

Very difficult to answer though...

Re:Amazon Sidewalk by ksec on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @02:40PM (#27133665)
It is quite well know ( mentioned multiples times in this thread and in every other TV discussions for he past years ) the smart features collect data and shows you ads which earn the manufactures a continuous stream of revenue.