eBPF on Windows

Re:eBPF on Windows by encryptluks2 on Monday May 10, 2021 @05:44PM (#27111244)

> define terrible. Compared to what ?

Terrible = significantly worse than a native Linux distro that doesn't use a file system integration layer.

> A very strong statement. Do you have any proof perhaps ?

Just experience working in the industry.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:eBPF on Windows by garethrowlands on Monday May 10, 2021 @06:23PM (#27111615)

> worse than a native Linux distro that doesn't use a file system integration layer

What filesystem integration layer?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:eBPF on Windows by encryptluks2 on Tuesday May 11, 2021 @04:49AM (#27115777)

> We recommend against working across operating systems with your files

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:eBPF on Windows by garethrowlands on Tuesday May 11, 2021 @07:39AM (#27116825)

Yes, having your compiler on Linux access its files over plan9 would indeed have terrible performance. That's why Microsoft tell you not to do that.

Just run everything on the Linux kernel and compilation will be the same as on Linux. You do have a choice of where you put your files.

[ Parent | on HN ]