News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why psychology isn’t science (2012) by tuismuggler on Sunday May 09, 2021 @05:08PM (#27099776)
The meter - while arbitrary as a UNIT of measurement - is defined. It is the length light will travel in a vacuum in 3.33ns ish. Whereas the unit of happiness has no such definition and varies from person to person.
Re:Why psychology isn’t science (2012) by snet0 on Sunday May 09, 2021 @05:28PM (#27099973)
It's defined in terms of other units.
Re:Why psychology isn’t science (2012) by alentist on Wednesday May 12, 2021 @04:37AM (#27128106)
SI units are now defined directly in terms of physical laws (no prototypes needed).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_redefinition_of_the_SI_ba...

Re:Why psychology isn’t science (2012) by cbmuser on Sunday May 09, 2021 @07:41PM (#27100960)
It’s an SI unit and directly defined through the speed of light which is a universal constant number.

While you need „second“ to define the „meter“, the former is not derived from other units but from an observation of nuclear reactions in Caesium.

Re:Why psychology isn’t science (2012) by snet0 on Sunday May 09, 2021 @05:35PM (#27100026)
Of course, once you get to the second, we are now just measuring something, and our unit is based on counting a thing. But how do you measure something that can't be counted?
Re:Why psychology isn’t science (2012) by skj on Sunday May 09, 2021 @05:26PM (#27099960)
How close are we to a black hole?