Re:Wikipedia is up (2001)
by ghaff on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:16PM
(#27097723)
One of the things that traditional encyclopedias (as well as a given book/magazine/etc.) have is a very clear view of the persona that they're writing for. With Wikipedia, this differs considerably from article to article depending upon the topic. With respect to many technical topics, especially in areas like math and physics, Wikipedia articles often dive right into equations and many articles are largely incomprehensible to anyone not already familiar with the subject matter.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia is up (2001)
by notahacker on Sunday May 09, 2021 @01:33PM
(#27097872)
And on the flip side, there are other technical topics where large parts of the article are written by people unschooled in the subject citing magazine and news articles which are online rather than the field's core texts which aren't...
Re:Wikipedia is up (2001)
by Kim_Bruning on Monday May 10, 2021 @07:49AM
(#27104906)
This could be considered more of a problem with scientific publishing (in those fields). This is changing though, so you might see wikipedia start to reflect that.