News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Politics and the English Language (1946) by abalaji on Thursday May 06, 2021 @04:05PM (#27068443)
I especially like how Orwell draws a contrived but all too true comparison between the following passages.

  I returned and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all. -- passage from Ecclesiastes
vs.

  Objective considerations of contemporary phenomena compels the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account. -- modern translation
I could definitely imagine reading the latter in an op-ed.
Re:Politics and the English Language (1946) by thazework on Thursday May 06, 2021 @11:48PM (#27071926)
The passage from Ecclesiastes is itself a translation of course, and though it is a very old translation it's not particularly good.

'I returned and saw under the sun' - where exactly is the speaker supposed to have returned from?

What is being conveyed, poorly, is that the speaker is having a moment of clarity.

https://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt3109.htm

Re:Politics and the English Language (1946) by imbnwa on Thursday May 06, 2021 @06:52PM (#27069895)
The latter I think is also what Taleb was referring to when, in the context of criticizing IQ, he remarked that most of Europe was a backwater for most of history
Re:Politics and the English Language (1946) by mscharrer on Friday May 07, 2021 @06:47AM (#27074474)
Unlike the former, I could also imagine the latter being produced by a Markov chain.