News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:White House eyes subsidies for nuclear plants to help mee... by Gibbon1 on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @03:59PM (#27054909)
Your comment is typical of the pro-nuclear stance where all of the failures are pinned on opponents. San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station wasn't closed because of Friends of the Earth. It was closed because the new steam generating tubes were wearing out two years after being installed. The regulators weren't about to let the operator run it as is. And the operator didn't want to pay to replace the steam tubes again. So they closed it.
Re:White House eyes subsidies for nuclear plants to help mee... by asdff on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @04:54PM (#27055684)
>the operator didn't want to pay to replace the steam tubes

How silly is that? This is kinda my point. 8% of power for the most populous state in the second most populous nation is no small amount. The operator didn't want to do the necessary maintenance, so we opt for a cheaper, objectively worse solution, instead of spending the money required to do the job correctly. It's not like it was physically impossible to fix San Onofre, the engineers know exactly what work is required to be done, but the beancounters in charge of the purse strings ultimately thought better and we are all worse off for it in ways that will costs us far in the longrun than this maintenance would have.

Re:White House eyes subsidies for nuclear plants to help mee... by godelski on Wednesday May 05, 2021 @04:33PM (#27055373)
It's possible you're reading something in my comment that I didn't intend.