News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A CBP contract shows the risks in connecting your vehicle... by epanchin on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @05:35PM (#27043195)
or cheap, vs the cost of running someone down.
Re:A CBP contract shows the risks in connecting your vehicle... by sokoloff on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @05:39PM (#27043224)
ABS does not significantly shorten stopping distances. It does provide improved steering control during brake applications that would otherwise exceed available traction, but I think it's extremely rare that ABS would be the difference between a pedestrian collision vs not. (They could just as easily choose a car that didn't have ABS as originally equipped and no one would say anything about the omission.)
Re:A CBP contract shows the risks in connecting your vehicle... by cnasc on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @06:36PM (#27043722)
> They could just as easily choose a car that didn't have ABS as originally equipped and no one would say anything about the omission.

That’s the kind of failure case I wish fancy electronics had. Component breaks = now you’re driving a lower trim-level. As opposed to $5000 touchscreen module dies and now you can’t use the car.

Re:A CBP contract shows the risks in connecting your vehicle... by alliao on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @07:06PM (#27043969)
you do realise the point of things breaking is so that people would be coerced to make a new purchase...
Re:A CBP contract shows the risks in connecting your vehicle... by h4waii on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @09:33PM (#27045089)
Being able to control the vehicle during emergency braking would ostensibly allow you to steer around the obstacle or pedestrian prior to impact.
Re:A CBP contract shows the risks in connecting your vehicle... by _hyn3 on Tuesday May 04, 2021 @07:24PM (#27044107)
It does in skid conditions by detecting the slippage and releasing and reapplying the brake far faster than you could alone.