Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by 55555 on Sunday May 02, 2021 @01:59AM
(#27012681)
This is a myth. I think 10,000 years ago there were only 2 million humans walking the earth. Fruit trees growing on uninhabited islands today have delicious sweet mangos. Fruits which exist but have never been cultivated at scale are also deliciously sweet.
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by shlant on Sunday May 02, 2021 @08:56AM
(#27014891)
yea just come to Borneo and try some of the native fruits to see how wrong that myth is ;)
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by chmod600 on Sunday May 02, 2021 @01:52AM
(#27012643)
While I'm sure not everyone had access to sweet fruit all the time, are you sure it was really so rare?
Fruit is meant to be eaten, so as long as plants have the spare energy, I don't see why they wouldn't make lots of appealing fruit.
Veggies would make more sense to be bitter.
Also, where did you get 1000 generations from? That's 20000 years in one place. It seems like a lot of humans would be a lot more mobile than that.
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by yosito on Sunday May 02, 2021 @02:25AM
(#27012786)
> Fruit is meant to be eaten
Meant by who? Evolution don't give a fuck...
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by LegitShady on Sunday May 02, 2021 @03:00AM
(#27012942)
I thought the whole evolutionary advantage was that animals spread the seeds around after eating the fruit, making survival much more likely. So not 'meant to be eaten' as in intentional choices, but meant to be eaten as in - this is why its an evolutionary advantage.
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by johnchristopher on Sunday May 02, 2021 @04:38AM
(#27013416)
By the plant. The plant that is driven by its genes to maximize its offspring.
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by hoka-one-one on Sunday May 02, 2021 @01:50AM
(#27012636)
Can you cite some sources please? I've tasted some very sweet wild berries.
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by shlant on Sunday May 02, 2021 @08:58AM
(#27014899)
here is some info refuting that often parroted myth:
1. https://twitter.com/Botanygeek/status/1149968041964396545
2. https://deniseminger.com/2011/05/31/wild-and-ancient-fruit/
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by johnchristopher on Sunday May 02, 2021 @04:39AM
(#27013420)
And I had some very sour apples so I think our anecdata cancel each other.
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by RugnirViking on Sunday May 02, 2021 @08:06AM
(#27014537)
The existance of fruit that isn't sweet is not a counter example to the fact that sweet fruit exists at all
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by Broken_Hippo on Sunday May 02, 2021 @05:06AM
(#27013563)
In addition to things other folks have said: Honey has existed for quite some time, because bees have existed for quite some time. Honey is pretty full of sugary goodness.
Re:Comparative assessments of dietary sugars on cognitive pe...
by shlant on Sunday May 02, 2021 @08:55AM
(#27014881)
> Earlier fruits didn't have anywhere near the sugar content of the cultivated ones today
This is not substantiated[1][2]
1. https://twitter.com/Botanygeek/status/1149968041964396545
2. https://deniseminger.com/2011/05/31/wild-and-ancient-fruit/
Sources of sugar such as sweet fruits and honey were rare delicacies, not daily occurrences.
Humans in various regions would have adapted over 1000 generations to better match their environment.
We live in a VERY different world now.