Re:“About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts t...
by acjohnson55 on Friday April 30, 2021 @08:35PM
(#27001602)
There are on-record accounts from both DHH and employees of what the actual disagreements were, and they were not political discussions. They were discussions about the list of "funny" customer names.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts t...
by anon7725 on Friday April 30, 2021 @08:59PM
(#27001772)
> they were not political discussions. They were discussions about the list of "funny" customer names.
They were not political in the sense of being about politicians or political parties. They were political in that they were motivated by the agenda and language of the activist left.
A subtext in many responses from said activists is that this is “not politics”, but something more essential or “above” politics. I agree insofar as they are treating their ideas more akin to a religion now.
Re:“About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts t...
by crooked-v on Friday April 30, 2021 @10:27PM
(#27002386)
How is "don't make fun of our own customers" an 'activist left' agenda? It may have been couched in liberal terms, but ultimately it's a pretty politics-free motivation.
Re:“About one-third of Basecamp employees accepted buyouts t...
by anon7725 on Friday April 30, 2021 @10:58PM
(#27002578)
Did you read anything about this? Nobody thought this was a good thing. Jason/DHH apparently addressed it multiple times over the course of months. A group within the company refused to move on, including someone who participated in making fun of customers.