Re:EU says Apple’s App Store breaks competition rules after ...
by nolok on Friday April 30, 2021 @12:32PM
(#26995661)
> the total cost of operating the App Store would be equally distributed amongst all apps
No it would not, it would be distributed by usage. If you wonder "would that possibly work ?", welcome to the internet, it works that way.
And it doesn't stop apple from offering special terms you can opt in for a flat 30% fee or entirely free if your app is entirely free (or ad supported) too.
Re:EU says Apple’s App Store breaks competition rules after ...
by austinkhale on Friday April 30, 2021 @12:37PM
(#26995736)
This is a strange take considering Facebook is distributed for free in the App Store with the current model. Apps paying the 30% tax _already_ subsidize Facebook’s distribution.
Re:EU says Apple’s App Store breaks competition rules after ...
by charwalker on Friday April 30, 2021 @12:44PM
(#26995834)
Does FB have in app purchases on iOS? If so, is 30% going to Apple as the processor?
Re:EU says Apple’s App Store breaks competition rules after ...
by lukeschlather on Friday April 30, 2021 @01:17PM
(#26996326)
Facebook is completely ad-supported. I guess the hole in Apple's revenue model is that they don't charge 30% of ad sales (of course I think this demonstrates how absurd the whole idea of charging a % of subscription revenue is.)
~A better idea would be to have a free tier and take a percentage above that. The first $1000 are a lot more valuable to the creator than everything beyond that.~
edit: OP said per download, misread it. That makes sense.