News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Labor Secretary throws support behind classifying gi... by thesimon on Thursday April 29, 2021 @04:01PM (#26985976)
In the UK apparently there are 3 types. The Economist wrote on the Uber case in UK:

“Employees” gain access to the full gamut of employment-law protections; “workers” get some protections but can be dismissed at will; the self-employed are taxed more lightly but receive few legal rights.

The Surpreme court ruled that Uber drivers are workers and not self-employed.

Re:U.S. Labor Secretary throws support behind classifying gi... by larkost on Friday April 30, 2021 @02:41PM (#26997538)
In most states in the U.S. all employees can be terminated at will. It is generally called "right to work" (yes... it is a questionable name). So essentially that first category does not exist in the U.S. (outside of a union where it gets tricky). So the Labor Secretary's decision amounts to the same decision.

And self-employed here generally are not taxed less, rather about the same (details vary), but have to do the taxation themselves.

I should note that you still can be fired illegally, for example surrounding harassment or protected status (gender, race, etc...).