News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT study finds indoor mask wearing much more effective t... by woofie11 on Thursday April 29, 2021 @09:11AM (#26980701)
What we know is that:

* Cloth masks reduce viral loads by somewhere around 30-70%.

* High-quality masks reduce them by e.g. 70-95% depending on how they're fitted.

* We know risk of infection (and severity) is related to viral load, but we don't quite know how.

* We have a lot of well-documented evidence from Asia about reduced infections when high-quality masks are used consistently (e.g. buses in China, hospitals in Singapore, etc.).

* We know masks significantly reduce R0, but we don't know by how much; error bars are huge, and dependent on a slew of other variables.

The key difference between public health settings and hospital settings is opportunities to be infected. As a doctor, I might have 10 opportunities per day, and if I don't have properly-fitted PPE one of those times, and I'm susceptible, I'll catch COVID19. This means half-measures do very little.

In a public health setting, it's a numbers game:

* Personal: If I have 1 opportunity per 2 weeks to be infected, and I reduce odds by 50%, I'm half as likely to catch COVID personally.

* Public health: If I reduce infection odds by 50%, R0 is cut in half. That's huge. Our exponent is very different.

So cloth masks are definitely worth the $2, but won't stop you from catching COVID if you take other risks. If everyone wore N95 or even surgical or nanofiber masks, COVID would probably be gone pretty quickly.

There are no comments on this comment yet.