Re:Google is saving $1B per year as a result of employees wo...
by jwogrady on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @10:06PM
(#26976664)
Once an employee has built a report with their team, knows their roll, is fully trained, properly equipped, and demonstrates proficiency at their job..... then I'm cool letting staff work from home. I suspect Google has the leadership, supervision, and infrastructure to do all those things at a large scale. Unfortunately for my crew I find brining everyone in is waaaaay more efficient....carbon emissions aside.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google is saving $1B per year as a result of employees wo...
by LordAtlas on Thursday April 29, 2021 @01:45AM
(#26977824)
> Once an employee has built a report with their team, knows their roll
Did you mean "rapport" and "role"? Because that sentence was a bit confusing.
Re:Google is saving $1B per year as a result of employees wo...
by pferde on Thursday April 29, 2021 @07:41AM
(#26979875)
Also, "brining everyone in"? They are all going to be very salty after that... :)
Re:Google is saving $1B per year as a result of employees wo...
by jlund-molfese on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @10:37PM
(#26976855)
That's a model I'd be interested in working under. It's different for everyone, but I find onboarding most efficient in person, and long-term work most enjoyable fully remote.
Re:Google is saving $1B per year as a result of employees wo...
by schnable on Thursday April 29, 2021 @08:36AM
(#26980357)
If the fully onboarded employees are all WFH, what good will bringing in new hires do?
[dead]
Re:Google is saving $1B per year as a result of employees wo...
by snovv_crash on Thursday April 29, 2021 @05:27AM
(#26979008)
If you completely ignore profits you go out of business and then the only companies left are the ones who ignore carbon. Better to get this changed at a legislative level to keep the playing field equal.