Re:Court: ‘ghost gun’ plans can be posted online without Sta...
by mgarfias on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @08:11PM
(#26975829)
just how could the court have ruled more narrowly than 5-4? Maybe Thomas only counts as 3/5 of a vote cuz hes black?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Court: ‘ghost gun’ plans can be posted online without Sta...
by majormajor on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @08:11PM
(#26975833)
Interpreted the second amendment more narrowly. Think for a second.
Re:Court: ‘ghost gun’ plans can be posted online without Sta...
by mgarfias on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @09:14PM
(#26976351)
Yeah, I did. A better ruling would have been on P&I grounds, as Gura had asked the court and Thomas concurred.
THAT would have nuked the drug war from orbit, along with every other instance of modern federal over reach.
As far as I’m concerned the ruling was stupidly ruled, and very carefully crafted to not upset any apple carts.
ETA: reread your statement above, it was very easy for me to misconstrue “narrow” as in the vote tally.