LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement

Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by shareme on Saturday June 25, 2011 @07:21PM (#2696895)

Yup, fuzz on their tails..

Not too smart either why include the number of Lulzsec members?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by sbierwagen on Saturday June 25, 2011 @07:24PM (#2696903)

1.) What useful information does "there are six of them" convey?

2.) What makes you think that they're not lying?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by redthrowaway on Saturday June 25, 2011 @07:33PM (#2696925)

1.) What information does the number of columns in a MySQL database convey? It's not just that there are six of them, but that records could be poured over for various irc servers in an attempt to link the 6 accounts that interacted with eachother the most. It allows for deeper inspection, and perhaps more information. However,

2.) They almost certainly are. I could see them saying how many people they actually had almost as a bluff, but more than likely they're just throwing out misinformation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by ianterrell on Saturday June 25, 2011 @07:27PM (#2696910)

Disinformation is most likely, but I've been hoping for some steganography from their Pastbins from day one.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by shareme on Saturday June 25, 2011 @07:29PM (#2696913)

chat logs show more than 6..

But its only 6 that are active in illegal stuff

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by Mad_Dud on Saturday June 25, 2011 @07:26PM (#2696908)

It doesn't have to be true.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LulzSec: 50 Days of Lulz statement by alvivar on Saturday June 25, 2011 @07:24PM (#2696904)

I guess is part of the concept... transparency, clarity...

[ Parent | on HN ]