News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by mixmastamyk on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @07:43PM (#26963553)
You added detail, yet didn't refute the statement. That it isn't easy to simply and specifically turn off is not acceptable.
Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by Klonoar on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @09:28PM (#26964290)
No, I'm fairly certain I refuted it.

The parent comment is incorrectly stating that each request to Apple is checking a binary, and it's not. This has been well documented both here on HN and across the web.

Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by mixmastamyk on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @10:15PM (#26964669)
That's not the definition of refute. The distinction between a lazy-implied always and merely often is pedantic. The point is that it happens enough to reduce performance, while doing something no end-user asked for and is difficult, if not impossible to disable without reducing other security protections.
Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by Klonoar on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @03:01PM (#26972841)
There is no measurable performance loss from that one time check - it's not something happening constantly.