News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by AgentOrange1234 on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @06:23PM (#26962636)
That sounds really interesting — what makes RISC-V better than ARM for this?
Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by edrxty on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @07:04PM (#26963120)
Partly the design of the core, partly the open source nature. Speaking from experience, it's really hard to push the envelope with ARM chips as they refuse to license them for FPGA deployments so there's not a lot of work being done there.
Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by varispeed on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @09:26PM (#26964278)
What stops anyone from implementing ARM ISA on FPGA? If you think of an ISA like an API - that's something that is not copyrightable, so in theory anyone could do ARM on FPGA. So I am guessing that nobody wants to bear the cost of such development and also risking potential lawsuit?
Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by edrxty on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @09:58PM (#26964531)
Yeah, that's pretty much it. There's no real upside and you risk a lawsuit. There are plenty of other ISAs that will work and are licensable for FPGA development