News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Neutron stars may be bigger than expected, measurement of... by jayd16 on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @03:45PM (#26960572)
>The reason this is somewhat irrelevant is because electric repulsion is about 60 orders of magnitude more than gravitational attraction so it's not expected black holes have a significant charge.

I hadn't thought about it but I guess that means protons or electrons have a maximum resting density. A group of those will never collapse from gravity?

Re:Neutron stars may be bigger than expected, measurement of... by throwaway2568 on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @04:26PM (#26961073)
Protons and electrons are both Fermions, which means they can not have identical quantum numbers (have to obey the Pauli exclusion principle as mentioned elsewhere in the thread). In the case of a very dense system, like the sun, this can lead to an effect known as degeneracy pressure (which acts against gravity). Essentially you have filled all the lower quantum numbers and then adding an extra proton/electron to the system requires a certain amount of energy. It's quite handwavy but the degeneracy pressure of electrons is mostly what keeps a white dwarf from contracting, whereas in the case of a neutron star it is the degeneracy pressure of neutrons (plus repulsive strong force and other effects as indicated in the OP). This kind of high level discussion is often covered in first year astronomy courses auditing a MOOC like the following may be of interest (https://www.edx.org/course/astrophysics-the-violent-universe)
Re:Neutron stars may be bigger than expected, measurement of... by Tagbert on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @03:52PM (#26960641)
If that were true, you would not get a neutron star where the electrons and protons are collapsed into neutrons. Not sure how that stands to the overall strength question, though.