News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by philjones_ca on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @10:17AM (#26956176)
The original Intel MacBook comes to mind as well

- released with the (32-bit) Core Duo processor in May 2006 - replaced with (64-bit) Core 2 Duo model in November 2006

It only was supported through to 10.6 Snow Leopard as 10.7 Lion went 64-bit only

Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by jonplackett on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @09:47AM (#26969302)
I got shafted with a similar 6 month duff product - the iPad 3. Now that was a bad decision. The iPad 4 came out later that year, with about 4X better performance and a switch to the lightning connector too.

I was so burned by that experience that I only bought an iPad again a month ago.

Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by jonplackett on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @01:19PM (#26958803)
Yes! Good example. I was thinking about that too but couldn’t remember my history enough to explain.

AirPods VS AirPods Pro is another I just remembered

I think watch v2 was a big improvement too.

Re:Apple's follow-up to M1 chip goes into mass production fo... by r00fus on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @03:30PM (#26960375)
My parents owned (still have) an OG Intel Mac Mini - the box said "Core Solo". Seems like that was one of the few devices sold with that chip.